Alright, so today we’re gonna have a little fun again. I’m going to show you all a principle of social organization that the very best science in the world can only verify. By this I mean, you could run any battery of tests or examine this claim in any context (save from within the throes of authoritarian-thinking, as its wildly paradoxical, deflective and dishonest) and the result will be the same.
And the principle I’m going to share with you today is this: Ideologues are always the greatest threats to the groups and ideals they seek to define themselves by.
Racists are and always have been the greatest threat to White people.
Niggas and militants are and always have been the greatest threats to Black people.
Zionists have always been the greatest threat to Jewish people.
Fundamentalists have always been the greatest threats to their religions and social movements.
Capitalists have always been the greatest threat to the free market.
“Conservatives” have always been the greatest threat to conservation.
“Liberals”, always the greatest threat to liberty.
Nationalists have always been the greatest threats to their (respective) nations.
Science enthusiasts and idealizers (not legitimate investigators and practitioners) have always been the greatest threat to science.
This list could literally go on for days…
Authoritarians have ALWAYS been the greatest threat to social order and society.
Again, this is a principle of social organization. It’s not subject to interpretation or change. It does not require anyone’s belief, but it can be observed within, and necessarily applied evenly to every social group, and then too, every virus and strain…
We’re not just talking about from a systemic-societal view, here. I’m saying directly, by a wide margin, ideologues represent the greatest direct threats to and from any group they appear within.
Whether you’re talking about a police officer who just ‘loves being a policeman and doling out justice to those he deems deserving’, or a hood nigga who just ‘loves doing, justifying and idealizing hood shit’, these individuals are the most dangerous elements to and within their own groups.
The ideologue — the authoritarian-thinker; the herd-minded individual; the hive-creature; the individual who just wants to be rewarded for belonging, is a dangerous, dangerous person.
They’re social predators, who will search for anything to exploit — to latch onto and hide behind that will award them license to either subjugate or prey upon others. They’re typically the most combative and saliently and secretly physically and verbally violent individuals within any given group. And they revel in the notions of status beliefs, out groupers (to mob up against or lord it over), hierarchies, etc, because their focus is never actually ‘the betterment or sustainability of the group or ideology’, but instead, the sense of power those things imbue them with.
And when there are no out-groupers to subjugate or prey upon, 99 out of 100 times these individuals will either create or mob up behind artificial divisions within their own groups. You could have thousands of people living in poverty who face the same social circumstance, and instead of collectivizing to best or at least improve their circumstance, you’ll get 30 gangs that emerge, who become even greater direct threats to their people than their oppressors.
Globally speaking, we’ve got all these people in law enforcement positions who target, suppress and murder people they barely socially-outrank themselves, due to status beliefs they experience for simply belonging to ‘team law enforcement’. They are the greatest direct threats to their own people, economies and countries. And after their countries are financially raped and pillaged, they’ll still have to live there — in the mess and circumstances they helped to create…
If the ideologue gets into a position of power, they will make stupid (mentally lazy) and selfish decisions on behalf of the group; endangering the group, by exposing it to unnecessary risk based solely on their own status beliefs, and their desire to protect whatever sense of authority they experience from being linked to the group or ideology in question.
The ideologue will fight to defend the honor, status and authority of the group or ideology without EVER considering the point, purpose, sensibility or function of either.
All of their thoughts are tied to the status and reputation of the group or ideology (as they view the group’s or ideology’s authority as an extension of their own); and then, only because they hope to benefit from the group or ideology in question. Their relationship with the things they seek to define themselves by is widely *parasitic — that is, one-sided.
Perhaps the greatest threat ideologues pose to the groups and ideologies they seek to define themselves by is that they run interference for, and then suppress truth and all relevant information and ideas that can be used to examine, strengthen, adjust and fortify their groups and ideologies, because they’re desperate to protect their own (perceived) status and reputation, which they experience by proxy of the group’s and/or ideology’s rank and status. Again, ideologues suppress truth and relevant information, in efforts to preserve the status of the group (or ideology), and in so, their own status and reputation.
So a group could be attracting pedophiles and rapists, and ideologues in positions of power would suppress and deny verifiable facts about their groups and ideologies, so as to preserve their group’s/ideologies’ moral status(es).
This makes them WILDLY dangerous, because it makes them fundamentally dishonest, which affects everything down to the way they view and experience reality, and approach interactions with others.
Again, the ideologue is always, ALWAYS the greatest threat.
The Christian who blindly defends clergy, the belief system and the impact its made on the world at large, is exponentially more dangerous to Christianity than the Jihadist.
Again… this list could go for days.