Meh. Ideologues are so incredibly unremarkable. All they know how to do is try to compete and/or assert authority.

No deeper questions, no investigation to see the amount of work I’ve done towards legitimating myself or my claims, no demonstrated desire to understand a single thing I’m talking about, just baseless assumptions and accusations. You’ve presented yourself to me as an unremarkable, and tragically insecure person.

You could’ve made this conversational, you know…

You could’ve asked things like: “What type of work have you done to verify your claims and purported capabilities? Have you also done any work towards falsifying your purported views and findings? What makes your views and beliefs fundamentally different from and/or more valuable than anyone else’s?”

But you didn’t do that did you? You just showed up doing what aggressive betas do. You demonstrated yourself to be yet another cowardly ideologue — a narcissistic, and tragically insecure and uncertain person, who seems to be of the belief that aggression can do the thinking for you.

Even worse, you haven’t identified any point you’re actually objecting to. It seems you’re here objecting to ME and my experience as a person, as opposed to an actual subject and/or point within any given topic of discussion. That’s called ad hominem ma’am, if you’re not familiar with it.

But read over what you wrote here: “A synthetic debate to prop up your understanding of intelligence all while claiming that we don’t understand intelligence.

Man I– how do I say this? I IMPLORE you to attempt some falsification of your beliefs. Divorce your ego (or “avatar”) from your claims — return with an argument that you haven’t fondled.

INB4 you call me a narcissist or say i’m competing with you[.]”

That doesn’t wreak of desperation to you? That doesn’t seem like thoughts coming from an emotionally weak, and tragically insecure person to you?

You’re here trying to compete against me, but you haven’t even settled on a topic to debate on. You haven’t isolated or expounded upon a single point you disagree with. And if you haven’t even picked out a thing to contest, then you obviously don’t have a position on any matter I’ve spoken to — and if you don’t have an official position on any subject I’ve spoken to, then you obviously don’t have any information or frames to support your would be position.

You’re just here barking at me, because I make you feel insecure and uncertain, and you don’t know what to do with the feelings I inspire you — as is the case with all cowardly ideologues.

Yeah…. this is you trying to lash out at me because I show you your weakness. What else you got? Make it interesting?