Origin of Existence
I read this dope post yesterday in one of the rooms I’m in, which was basically reframing the way people approach the concept of God.
It was exceptionally well-written and argued. One of the points the author touched on was existence, and (at least from what I gathered) it necessarily having an origin…
So I wanted to write a post today, explaining the concept of existence on my own page so as to not detract from his stellar argument or series. And I actually explained this in some of my videos already, so this isn’t necessarily in response to his post, but I just want to reiterate it today, as I’m inspired to BY his post…
Existence has always been. It is part of a principle I refer to in my work as “inferred polarity”…
And its a principle, but its also a really simple equation too, and it goes like this: “In order for something to be or qualify as ‘created’ (and/or to have an origin), you first have to be able to create and destroy it’s polar opposite.”
And this principle applies to states and conditions, and not to phenomena that are subject to, that channel or that enter into states or conditions…
So for instance, in order for the state/condition of ‘hot/heat’ to be or qualify as a created phenomenon (and/or, have an origin if you will), you’d first have to be able to create and destroy cold as a phenomenon. And not just in a room, or as experienced by individuals or groups, or within a vacuum, or the even the entire universe. We’re talking about heat as a state/condition that exists mutually exclusive of reality. The principles of hot and cold exist mutually exclusive of reality in the sense that they would have to be or represent things that existed independent of and prior to reality. Reality can CHANNEL the states/conditions ‘hot’ and ‘cold’, however, they exist independent of reality.
In other words, people or beings living within reality can create sources of heat, or even give off heat themselves, but they could never actually create heat as a phenomenon, as it exists mutually exclusive of and prior to reality.
Another example is ‘life’. In order for life to be a ‘created phenomenon’, one would first have to be able to create and destroy death.
The same principle effectively applies to the male-female dynamic. One cannot exist without the other. The bonding-separation dynamic is set, in that one value cannot exist without the other to balance it.
In this same way, existence has always been. Because in order for existence to be created and/or to have an origin, one would first have to be able to create and destroy nonexistence. And since it is impossible to either create or destroy nonexistence, it means existence has always been.
In other words, can does one destroy a value that isn’t even there?
Existence is the balance and counterpart to nonexistence.